Heads of department or school are responsible for nominating External Examiners. This should be during the Summer Term. Executive Deans, a nominee of the appropriate Faculty or Academic Partnerships, are responsible for the approval of the appointment.
Please note that while the Quality and Academic Development Team aim to complete all nominations within two months of receiving all appropriate information from the department/school, there may be delays from the External Examiner when conducting the Right to Work check, or from other teams involved in the process. Therefore, we strongly recommend that departments/schools proactively work towards approaching new External Examiners and send QUAD the relevant information as early as possible to reduce the risk of delay to new appointments.
Departments/schools should seek to distribute the workload of their Externals evenly and in line with the principles which govern the University's External Examiner policy.
External Examiners are appointed for four consecutive years, in exceptional circumstances, a fifth year may be considered with the permission of the relevant Executive Dean or nominee, in order to provide continuity, or where a programme is ending. Examiners may not be re-appointed as an External Examiner for a taught award of the University for another five years, unless exceptional circumstances apply and five years have elapsed since their last appointment.
Once nominations have been approved, the Quality and Academic Development team send a formal letter of invitation to the External Examiner, specifying the awards and modules to which they have been appointed and asking the Examiner to confirm the appointment is accepted and that they are prepared to operate in line with the University's expectations, as described in the roles and responsibilities.
Departments/schools need to check that the proposed External meets the criteria before submitting a nomination.
There may be some instances when an External does not meet all of the criteria, for example, where the field to be covered is highly specialised and the pool of possible Externals is very limited. In such an instance, the department/school should provide a written rationale which addresses those criteria the proposed External does not meet, alongside the nomination form.
University of Essex departments/schools use the External Examiner Nomination Portal
Restricted to University of Essex staff, the External Examiner Nomination Portal is used by departmental/school staff for nominating an External Examiner, and for making changes to existing appointments. The system is an enhancement of the University's existing personnel management system iTrent, and will record details of External Examiner nominations, course/module allocations and decisions in the nomination approval process.
Partner institutions use the External Examiner nomination form (.docx)
Currently, nominations for External Examiners for partner institutions should be made using a nomination form sent to external.examiners@essex.ac.uk.
All nominations will need to include:
If the External Examiner cannot supply any of the required documentation, please seek advice from us via external.examiners@essex.ac.uk.
It will not be possible to accept or process any new recommendations without this information.
As an institution the University should aim to have a suitably diverse external examiner pool such that it reflects the richness and diversity of the higher education sector. Departments/schools are encouraged to review their appointment and recruitment strategies to ensure that this is reflected in the external examiners they appoint. These external examiners in turn will contribute to the inclusiveness of the University’s teaching, learning and assessment processes.