Appointment criteria for research degree examiners

Eligibility to be an external examiner

The external examiner for a research degree should be:

  • research active with appropriate expertise
  • normally employed in an HE institution (if not, including Emeritus Professors, a case as to their suitability needs to be made)
  • a senior member of staff and/or an experienced examiner (if not, a senior and experienced internal examiner must be appointed)
  • qualified to the level at which they are being appointed to examine (if not, a case as to their suitability needs to be made).

The external examiner should not:

  • have been a former member of the academic staff or a student of the University or Partner Institution in the past five years
  • be a prospective member of staff in the process of applying for a position at the University or Partner Institution or recently been appointed to a staff position (this applies at any point during the examination process)
  • have been involved in the supervision of the student
  • have a professional or personal relationship with the student, the student’s supervisor or the internal examiner that might give rise to a conflict of interest*.

Eligibility to be an internal examiner

The internal examiner for a research degree should be:

  • a member of the academic or research staff of the University or Partner Institution (visiting staff cannot be appointed as an internal examiner)
  • research active with appropriate expertise
  • normally have a degree, or equivalent, at the level at which they are being appointed to examine (if not a case as to their suitability needs to be made). A Professor with appropriate publications would be considered to be ‘equivalent’ and a case would not need to be made.

The internal examiner should not:

  • have been the student’s supervisor (main, joint or secondary) other than acting as a temporary supervisor for a period of up to a year but not in the final 12 months before submission of the thesis
  • have been a member of the Supervisory Panel during the final six months before submission of the thesis
  • have a professional or personal relationship with the student or the external examiner that might give rise to a conflict of interest
  • be the partner or a close relative of the supervisor (main, joint or secondary).

Conflicts of interest

The following are conflicts of interest and should be avoided, as they will prevent appointment of the Examiner:

  • a personal relationship -such as family relation (by birth/adoption or marriage) or friendship that would give rise to a conflict of interest
  • collaboration or co-authorship with the student (either the external and/or internal)
  • the external examiner has undertaken collaboration or co-authorship with the supervisor or internal examiner on topics closely related to the student’s research within the past 5 years
  • the supervisor has recently (within 3 years), examined, or been appointed to examine, a research student under the supervision of the external examiner
  • the external examiner has recently (within 3 years), examined or been appointed to examine, a research student under the supervision of either the supervisor or internal examiner
  • an academic relationship exists (such joint teaching, membership of the same research group, or sitting on the same funding committee), between the external examiner and the supervisor and/or internal examiner
  • the external examiner was the supervisor’s or internal examiner’s supervisor or the supervisor’s or internal examiner’s supervisee.
  • the external was involved in teaching and/or supervision and/or assessment of the student (including at another institution) as part of a previous award and has maintained a professional relationship with them since.

Departments/schools should also avoid overuse of individual examiners.

Arrow symbol
Need help?
Postgraduate Research Education Team